#PeerReview quality gets worse with each upcoming #AI conference. Our #ICLR2020 reviews has extreme swings (8s and 1s). Reviewers giving low scores are nasty and bitter. Its like they are out on a war and want to destroy competition. Not healthy. What are the alternatives?
-
-
Self-evaluation of expertise in
#PeerReview#ICLR2020 is bizarre. Clueless people claim to be experts (often of privileged class). Humble people don't want to do that. I have seen as AC, professors who rank themselves in the middle and undergrads rank themselves as experts.Show this thread -
Even most non-controversial tweet brings out
#Trolls Goes with being a#woman with opinions on#twitter This dude blocked me from replying because I wrote that traditionally men have been told they are fragile if they express their emotions. Toxic masculinity is linked to this.pic.twitter.com/CiSlP30gDL
Show this thread -
There is lack of civility in
#AI communities. Prominent "leaders" behave terribly. (I had someone call current times as "revenge of#neuralnets and destroy all other researchers). I have made enemies when I have called out their racist and sexist posts.Show this thread -
One more
#troll with no logical abilities attacking me personally for talking about#PeerReview Wasn't just one review: thanks to collaborators, I am on several papers. Saw a general trend. What does this have to do with my number of followers? Thanks@sdathath for your response.pic.twitter.com/CjWM5ONPag
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sounds like an example of the Dunning-Kruger effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.