Know where to focus my publish efforts next lol 
I wonder the reasons behind the variation across different conferences.https://twitter.com/mldcmu/status/1144245147745566720 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Happy that ICRA is not the worst. Personally I found it more open than other conferences.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Depressingly low numbers. I also wonder how this compares against the percentage of women authors in all accepted papers per conference. i.e. is there an additional bias specifically for awards, on top of any other existing biases?
-
I was wondering the same thing!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wow ICRA is low %!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting that CVPR has so few best papers from women. Longuet-Higgins aren't as poorly represented I think.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Zero for CVPR. Zero.
-
1 if you consider CVPR 2019.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The difference between ICML and NeurIPS is especially surprising....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.