-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Peer review is not the scientific method. Peer review is intended to support the scientists' claims that they followed scientific methods, and to assist those less intimately familiar with the science in judging the value of the research. It can also be abused to censor/devalue
Yes, #peerreview it has its drawbacks, but completely skipping that is not the right approach. #openreview system for #ICLR has been great for our field where reviewers have to post their review in open. Please do not go directly to media. That distorts #AI research
-
-
Agreed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lex Fridman from
@MIT blocked me because I urged him to avoid#AI#mediahype and publish in#peerreview venues. As a premier educational institution, how can you allow this? There are guidelines that university research should be released to public -
I have now reported this disturbing behavior to
@MIT Academic institutions are only remaining hope in tackling media hype and distortion around#AI They have to remain accountable and publish research and participate in#peerreview process - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.