Prof. Anima Anandkumar

What you are doing is opposite of open. It is unfortunate that you hype up +propagate fear + thwart reproducibility+scientific endeavor. There is active research from other groups in unsupervised language models. You hype it up like it has never been done before. @jackclarkSF

Hi there. We've released a paper, samples, and small model. Not our intention to hype our research relative to others (DM me specifics here and can probably help?). How do you think about intersection of increasingly general models and potential for malicious use?

Malicious BS. You are doing a disservice to science by using that word. #AI progress is largely attributed to open source and open sharing. What irony @openAI is doing opposite and trying to take a higher moral ground. Can u list all so-called malicious cases and I will respond

This is exactly hype and misleading the media. Where is any evidence that your system is actually capable of doing this? Which independent researchers have scrutinized your system? None. Media people don't count.

Thanks for continuing discussion - the conditional news samples are pretty striking and have been fairly consistent. I feel like journalists are the appropriate experts to consult with regard to the news aspects. Talked to a few governments re disinformation and got validation