For 30+ years, particle physicists' predictions for where breakthrough discoveries are waiting have been wrong. False promises based on such flawed predictions erode trust in physics - and science in general. Particle physicists should fix this problem.https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/23/opinion/particle-physics-large-hadron-collider.html …
There are adaptive statistical techniques to decide what hypotheses to choose adaptively while controlling false discovery rates. Are any such techniques used to decide the triggers?
-
-
False discovery is rather irrelevant in the trigger where with selection rates below 1 in 10000 it's all about not missing a potential signal. While thresholds may be adjusted online, adaptive algorithms are also tricky in terms of keeping control of this huge rejection.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.