I have trouble buying in to a methodology that doesn't somehow stratify score ranges & run the analysis independently within those bins. e.g. You can drill the permutation formula into a kid w/ a natural 600 math score. A 450 score, who knows?
-
-
If my hypothesis were true, the real finding of that paper is roughly 'test prep is most advantageous for +1.5-2.5SD IQ population.' For whatever racial group in that range is under-represented in test prep, there is low-hanging fruit that could shuffle college admissions mix.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Yes. And doesn't that jive w/ your experience on campus? Bayes rule: you must choose lab or groupwork partner based on nothing but visual cues, what's your choice?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
another thought here is that past a certain pt diminished returns to scale are driven by time-pressure (ie teaching ppl 1M techniques to try is counterproductive) so imbalanced skillsets might affect teachability
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.