Secure title (at any level) is not politically negotiable by definition. Are you wanting to say something further?
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @rec0nciler
Hmm.. I never fully bought the idea MM promulgated that there's effectively "no point" without total and complete sovereignty. Allow me to explain.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
My argument is empirical. We know that most of the world is partially or largely a puppet of the USA. And yet. Regime diversity is significant and offers lasting and real Exit options. I've taken one. To Singapore.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
I've seen alot of the world (as I'm sure many of you have ) and am not convinced that incomplete sovereignty renders the project of neocameralism completely moot because frankly a huge diversity of regime service offerings exists already.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
I think this whole thing here is an example of letting "perfect be the enemy of good"
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
-
-
-
Replying to @Alrenous
We’ll remember to come back to this dialogue later then.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Gianni Retweeted Gianni
My thoughts in a thread with Ron last year. Talking about sovereignty as a binary gets you bogged down in metaphysics. Some kind of updating expectations model might be a way to think about it, but i never fully fleshed out the idea.https://twitter.com/AngloRemnant/status/901589613541773312?ref_src=twcamp%5Ecopy%7Ctwsrc%5Eandroid%7Ctwgr%5Ecopy%7Ctwcon%5E7090%7Ctwterm%5E1 …
Gianni added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.