Did I miss the actual confirmation of his identity? This reminds me of "voice confirmations" which were notoriously BS (improved, maybe?)
-
-
Replying to @The_WGD
No, and i dont even know if it's commonly accepted, but all trails lead to him.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AngloRemnant
I'm close to completely uninterested in his identity, but "compare the writing" type algorithms strike me as impossible.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @The_WGD
Why so? I have no expertise, but mapping a written fingerprint (within some margin of error) seems totally doable in theory.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AngloRemnant
My assumption is that word preference is more closely linked to demographic traits than anything else, for starters. Everyone sounds like a
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @The_WGD
Plausible. But validating accuracy with some out-of-sample experimenting would be pretty easy if you had one of these tools in your hands.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AngloRemnant
My only firsthand (secondhand, tbh) experience is with voice ID, which was terrible at the time.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @The_WGD
I remember some real sketchy stuff coming out of isreal about 5 years ago. Some Fin/Acct research based on it got published in top journals.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AngloRemnant
That's interesting. I don't know that I've heard about it. 99% of what's out there is psyops, though (again, based on my limited experience)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Bulk analysis of earnings calls & supposed mkt anomalies found. But they never revealed the black box behind the tech, lol.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.