Creeping doubt in nrx-style analysis. Could the dominant political faction really get away w/ such open maliciousness? Then the FALK pardon.
-
-
-
Replying to @mfckr_
The meta aspect, as opposed to actual nrx content. Suspicions of explanations appear too clean and comprehensive.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AngloRemnant
To me NRx abstractions frequently come across as too kludgy. I also question whether they bring any novel insight.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mfckr_ @AngloRemnant
Most of the philosophical commentary was already well covered by previous thinkers (Spengler, etc).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mfckr_
True, but the synthesis of those thinkers was something novel afaik. Who else is explaining modernity w Spengler, Lippmann & DeJouv?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @AngloRemnant @mfckr_
..Reactionary wisdom on the failings of modernity used to be common. NRX has an explanation for why the fail happened anyway.
8:29 AM - 18 Jan 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.