argument so far in my paper for the conference on @UF_blog : constitutions are cybernetic controllers on the political sphere...
-
-
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @UF_blog
Going with the 'controller' language, a major failing of constitutional design is an omission of an 'integral' term.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
.. Integral, meaning the ability to correct for the error accumulated over time from the set point..
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
..Though often (as in the case of the USA) starting with the correct set-point can give you a lot of runway.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @AngloRemnant @UF_blog
constitutional orders are supposed 2 learn over time (ie, covariate with the forces that compose it and its environs)
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
I don't find it obvious that "constitutional orders are supposed 2 learn over time."
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Stimulating. The Interactor/Replicator distinction is a frame I ought to spend more time chewing on..
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AngloRemnant @tonreihe and
..My reservation wrt an individual service focus is that the unit econ of gov't lends itself to bundling:
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
..there is a big incentive to bundle low/zero marginal cost services e.g. http://oz.stern.nyu.edu/cite05/readings/bakos4.pdf …
-
-
Replying to @AngloRemnant @tonreihe and
..the "bundle + guns(deterrence)" is going to be the fundamental unit of competition.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.