One should expect optimal solutions to be illegible.
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev @themattsimpson
Yes; the tricky bit is to not take tradition as optimal in a sacred way, for all the obvious reasons.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
So the problem spec is to balance tradition with a rational systems view while preserving a conservative bias.
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
I have thought about this a lot, and I'll never have time to write about it. So I humbly propose:
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @twnutt @Meaningness and
you're correct to think about the problem in terms of systems. An emergent feature of complex, >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @twnutt @Meaningness and
non-linear dynamic systems is the presence of local maxima/minima distinct from global max/min.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @twnutt @Meaningness and
A conservative can allow for the possibility of a higher optimum, somewhere else in the >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @twnutt @Meaningness and
multi-dimensional space. The difficult question is how to get there. That is where part 2 comes in.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @twnutt @Meaningness and
The model of "massively parallel optimizer" specifically appeals to evolution.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @twnutt @Meaningness and
So a prescriptive theory of conservatism should be based on seeding evolutionary processes.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
This is exactly where NRX plugs in, with Yarvin's Patchwork. Solve problems in space, not time.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.