If voting isn't supererogatory, aren't we forced into taking actions even more likely to change the outcome?
Yes. And the fact that this is mathematically true tells us that Scott has the numerator is way off.
-
-
follow the $5,999 tire-slashing analogy to its end... total value value estimate never changes, but..
-
..the marginal cost youre willing to pay to eliminate each subsequent voter increases.
-
Well, one assumes the marginal probability of swinging the election decreases to zero too.
-
at some point you run out of trump voters
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.