Deconstruct & analyze the following statement >
-
-
Endless Meta (exemplified by that response). Severely restricted substance. Delusions of relevance.
-
But primarily that none of the content is even remotely 'reactionary'. False advertising. Bad faith.
-
I was guessing the term might be your main point of contention..
-
..that wing of NRx really is Ancap + formalist analysis. Pretty far afield from reaction.
-
we've gone very far left when classical liberalism can pass itself off as reaction
-
Is "fate" about life under law of accidents while "providence" is about life under grace?
-
Serious question.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.