Probably I'm in the minority, but I enjoy every argument over alt-right/NRX points of differentiation..
-
-
..if forced explain NRX at gunpoint, Id just say it's the next step in rigor and explanatory power after classical liberalism > ancap > NRX.
-
Not much realization in the community that Ancap gets you 99% of the way to the Should. But ancap misses the historical formalization.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I can see that becoming standard. Really, an enlightened prof could sub Yarvin+Szabo in place of Nozick without losing much fidelity.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
My impression is that NRx really wants a more efficient version of current globalism. Openly saying so would lose supporters.
-
Yes. The venn-diagram of non-negotiables doesn't actually even intersect with the Alt Right.
-
Right. NRx is fully on board with techcomm, kind of okay with traditionalists, but really has no use at all for ethnats.
-
The ethnat part of the trike seems like an attempt to co-opt people they consider numerous but stupid, aka entryism.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.