Kling concisely formulates the dominant "bonding mechanisms" b/t individuals assumed in the 3 mainstream ideologies: http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/methodological-individualism-and-atomism/ …
-
-
..Taking Spandrell’s NRX trichotomy as a given, does any single factor cleave them as accurately as its emphasized human bonding mechanism?.
-
..e.g. Eth-Nat = extended kinship. Tech-Comm = trading partners. Theo = central gov. Or am I trafficking in tautology?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.