Broad historical strokes for everyone today...
Teasing you @PresbyPolemics but your "universal" claim needs a little work. As for the practice of your closely held tradition, see my other responses in thread. Broad strokes aren't helpful.
-
-
Smily faces dont make statements true, bro. Let me know if you get to read baptism in the early church. Its written by two paedobaptist scholars.
-
Please, fire me a link. I'd love to read it, for real. I'm just saying, we have a mountain of evidence from the late 1st and early 2nd century of a tradition of Infant baptism - I could go into archaeology as well. As long as we have records, its been in the Church.
-
Aside from Tertullian, who was no stranger to peculiar (and later, heretical) views, there simply is nobody speaking out about baptizing infants. Its just accepted as a normal part of Church practice, which in such a short period of time is odd on a Credo model.
-
Thanks for the talk though, men. Really leaving now as I'm headed to Fort Worth from San Antonio. Appreciate the time.


-
I appreciate it, take care and God bless. Safe journey! :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.