"Concede to us or face consequences" is a veiled threat. This goes both ways.https://twitter.com/soledadobrien/status/1061314585431498752 …
-
-
My oft-stated desire is for national divorce. Then we can sit back and watch while the globalists try to control their ever-more-numerous clients. I don't know who will win, but it won't be our problem either way.
-
National divorce doesnt have precedent here, though it'd be the choice with the least amount of conflict. We deported military generals in texas who had indio ancestry. It just takes a willing strongman to do it and a willing people to elect him.
-
The problem isn't just the demographic shift. It's the fact that white people are naturally more liberal (in the broadest sense of the term), so a large portion of them (25%? 33%) ardently believe in policies and ideals that have become maladaptive.
-
Some of this is the result of media conditioning, but that propaganda is building traits that are present among white liberals to begin with. IMO they're not locked in here with us. We're locked in here with them (and their ever-swelling ranks of imported auxiliaries).
-
Wypipo want things to be 'fair' and just. When prog values are presented as such with no opposition beyond vague reaganite slogans they wont deny them, esp in the face of litigation and such.
-
I guess I'm more pessimistic than you are about the effect that a good institutional house-cleaning would have on America as a whole (desirable though it may be). I think our differences within the empire are irreconcilable, even under a Caesar.
-
More "conservative" (economic leninism) institutionalization is obviously not the solution.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.