Either you're mislabeling or we need to differentiate inappropriate coercion from appropriate coercion.
One shouldn't get benefits bc they're a Nazi. But if Nazism is due to depression, should get psychiatric care; if due to impoverishment, should get economic benefits. Hanson and you are inadequately addressing vileness of 'incel' misogyny, objectification, violence.
-
-
-
Reddit has left many vile communities untouched but r/incel was *too* vile for them.
-
You and Hanson think we're debating you on the policy aspects for people experiencing suffering. We're not. They are duh-level obvious.
-
I assure you, it's pretty clear you're debating at the "omfg I hate you nerds sooooo much" level.
-
I have no hate for you. I am probably nerdier than you. I just know women who have been raped. They're my friends, my patients. And you're, at best, irresponsibly playing a supporting role for a subculture that promotes sexual violence.
-
I am not supporting or promoting sexual violence!
-
I get that you think you're not and I agree you're not explicitly. I am saying you are neglecting the information ecosystem complexities and the responsibilities you have to that. Vaccine safety can be discussed but carefully. You're being quite uncareful is all I'm saying.
-
I'll need a lot more detail to be convinced of your "uncareful" claim.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Seems to me a significant part of your disagreement is over differing interpretations of the word 'incel'.
@stucchio interprets it literally as what it's short for: the involuntarily celibate.@AndrewMakeTweet interprets it as those who call themselves 'the incel community'.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.