Andrew M. Webb

@AndrewM_Webb

Machine learning R&D | I make maths/science animations | 𝗧𝗼𝗽 𝘁𝘄𝗲𝗲𝘁𝘀:

Manchester, England
Vrijeme pridruživanja: svibanj 2015.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @AndrewM_Webb

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @AndrewM_Webb

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    2. sij

    To count an animal population if you can't catch them all: capture some, mark them, release, and capture again. The ratio of new vs already seen tells you something about the total number. Shown here is iterated mark-and-recapture with a Bayesian updates to belief about pop size

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. 22. sij

    Not sure how interesting that is, but it occurred to me today and I found it slightly surprising. That average error factor is for two numbers with mantissas uniform over [0, 10). In the worst case, the factor is ~1.74

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. 22. sij

    To compute a geometric mean in normalized scientific notation, take the arithmetic mean of exponents and the geometric mean of mantissas. But for a quick mental approximation, take the arithmetic mean of *both*. The result is an overestimate, on average by a factor of only ~1.09

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. ožu 2018.

    No individual colour making up this wave travels faster than the grid lines, but the sum of all components appears to outrace the grid. This is how “group velocities” can exceed the speed of light without carrying information.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 13. sij

    A different version of the video comparing the speed of a hummingbird and the rotation rate of the fastest known pulsar. (I added a marker to the equator so you can see when it completes a full rotation, and the animation starts much faster.)

    Poništi
  6. 11. sij

    There is a neutron star that rotates 716 times per second. How fast is that? In this illustration, it rotates 9 times while a hummingbird executes half a flap of its wings. (h/t ) (Hummingbird footage from the Slow Mo Guys: )

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    9. sij

    Because there is nothing more useful than a mathematical trick, and thanks to your feedback, find the updated ML trick slide -:) Please RT, add even more to the list !!!

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    5. sij
    Poništi
  9. 5. sij

    Apologies for tweeting/deleting this a couple of times, there were a couple of mistakes in there.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 5. sij

    2^86 is conjectured to be the greatest power of two whose decimal does not contain the digit zero. Here's an informal argument showing that if you can treat the digits as random then the conjecture is probably true.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. ruj 2019.

    Small differences are magnified in chaotic systems. This also makes it hard to reverse numerical simulations. In the forward sim, 2 pendulums are close until t=15. At t=22, velocities are reversed. In reverse simulation, they come together from t=15 to t=10, then diverge again

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 2. sij
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 2. sij

    Enough people asked for details that I wrote something about Bayesian iterated mark-and-recapture here: .

    Poništi
  14. 2. sij

    Assumption made here: the animals move around enough between measurements that you can treat each capture event as a random selection from the population, independent of the previous capture

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 2. sij

    It's funny that the first 'measurement' is much less informative than subsequent ones: it just tells you that the population is at least as large as the number of animals you've captured.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 2. sij

    The left side shows a crude simulation of animals moving around, which are periodically captured. Colour indicates number of times captured. Right side is a distribution describing belief over the population size.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 30. pro 2019.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 30. pro 2019.

    I know I probably shouldn't even engage, but: here's some boring brutal actual data. There's actually a weak negative correlation for both men and women (coefficients -0.02 and -0.08) between welfare spending as a percentage of GDP and mean BMI.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 12. pro 2019.

    (Pre-empting replies, I'm sure the extent of maths education in CS programmes varies greatly!)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 12. pro 2019.

    Skills that need to be taught in undergraduate computer science curricula: - maths

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·