In particular R3/R4 seems to have changed (around §4.3) the proposal so that an allocator can continue to throw on allocation failure (but needs to signal that it does). Still don't get why the paper uses GUI applications as a benchmark for testing real-world OOM resistance.
-
-
Show this thread
-
I would assume that, even when "just" looking inside the MS universe, that e.g. MS SQL Server is much more likely to be allocation failure resistant than word or powerpoint.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Oh dear, it was true!!!

-
What was true?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.