Similar to what happened before with, eg, Linux, big vendors will hire those maintainers. Good code isn't going away. It's simply going to be written by communities comprised of self-interested actors rather than one self-interested vendor. There's nothing healthy abt the latter
-
-
JM: I literally cannot think of a single one. I can think of a few that they hired who ceased being maintainers after they went to work for AWS.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fuzzychef @johnmark and
This has more to do with AWS being a low-margin business, than with any kind of bad faith, but the result is the same: they suck money out of the ecosystem without contributing code.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @pwramsey @fuzzychef and
Very much so, but reality of Amazon's contributions so far have never come even close to the promises, and the promises fall far short of being a sustainable community participant. Especially given how their existence makes other business models for employing PG devs less viable.
1 reply 1 retweet 19 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Dee_Marketing @AndresFreundTec and
So...not open source, then? :-) What you’re describing is called “proprietary software.” It’s 100% fine. But let’s not conflate it with open source. Vendors who want the benefits of open distribution without the $$ implications live in la la land
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
It's proprietary software where you can see the source code.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.