The overhead of doing JIT for queries as short as those used in that benchmark is never worth it. Even leaving the overhead of doing JIT aside, the bottlenecks are entirely elsewhere. The planner realizes that and avoids the use of JIT.
@michaellarabel A transactional workload like pgbench's tpc-b like workload, be it readonly or read-write, will never use JIT. You're just seeing run-to-run variation.
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=PostgreSQL-11-JIT-Benchmarks …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.