Nor, @MarkWarner, does your statement at all address the destruction of evidence. Even the public testimony pretty much implied awareness of guilt, and at that point Haspel was in a senior enough management position to act on that.
-
-
Show this thread
-
FWIW, if the statement had instead been "Haspel is a bad candidate, but the other candidates would likely be much worse" (*cough* Cotton, *cough), that'd have been less unconvincing.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.