I hope I'm proven right on this one...
My understanding is @Scotus hasn't quite made that determination. If I understand the opinion right it says the *statute* doesn't "implicitly" contain limit. The 9th circuit could now re-consider on constitutional (e.g. due process) grounds. The oral argument implied sympathy.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.