I just don’t understand how McGahn didn’t have a full clearance that late, and wonder if it explains him looking the way on everyone else.https://twitter.com/dafnalinzer/status/963945828569243648 …
-
-
Replying to @matthewamiller
This might be somewhat overblown. Per the full story McGahn had his TS clearance as of November; only the SCI part was interim.https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/amp/scores-top-white-house-officials-lack-permanent-security-clearances-n848191?__twitter_impression=true …
1 reply 9 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @EricColumbus @matthewamiller
Isn't that the *interesting* part? If I understand correctly SCI isn't managed by WH?
1 reply 3 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @AndresFreundPol @matthewamiller
Eric Columbus Retweeted Mark S. Zaid
Possibly, as noted by
@MarkSZaidEsq:https://twitter.com/MarkSZaidEsq/status/963963309857890304?ref_src=twcamp%5Eshare%7Ctwsrc%5Em5%7Ctwgr%5Eemail%7Ctwcon%5E7046%7Ctwterm%5E2 …Eric Columbus added,
1 reply 3 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @EricColumbus @AndresFreundPol and
Did he have clearance when he was working in the Obama admin? And once the orange nightmare became president, lost it at some point? Or did he not need it in his previous role?
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
FWIW, working in Obama admin sounds like Obama had a choice in the matter. He was initially nominated by Bush, and there's rules about FEC membership being split between parties.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.