My takeaway fr Cobb v. McGahn: 1) McGahn is (obv) architect of totally illegal privilege w/o privilege we've seen w/Coats, Sessions, Rogers
-
-
A bit, from SSCI, but not systematically.
-
is it just a PR choice or are they able to withhold more expansively by not invoking privilege?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.