It's really quite remarkable. https://twitter.com/insufferabIes/status/904535772627427328 …
That'd at least partially because she wasn't at the NYT before 2010. And there wasn't comparably much intrigue in the Obama admin.
-
-
Right. During that administration, reporting was (to a greater degree than the current degree, which is zero) focused on actual policy.
-
Isn't that to a significant degree because there was a working policy process back then? Currently policy is partially made by intrigue.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
My point is that her reporting contributes to the reality-TVification of the USA, but this is only because the Times gives her a megaphone.
-
I don't quite agree that Maggie is a significant cause (or even symptom) of this, but agree the "TVificiation" is a huge concern.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Now it's focused on what Javanka's unsuccessfully trying to talk Trump out of, or how many bowls of ice cream Trump is eating.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If her reporting were in the National Enquirer, where it belongs, I wouldn't have a problem with it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.