Ok, folks, since people seemed to appreciate my annotation of yesterday's collusion story, here are some thoughts on today's. /1/
-
-
Replying to @benjaminwittes
First, note the sourcing. This is clearly NOT an investigative leak. This is a set of White House admissions in response to the story. /2/pic.twitter.com/YUW64ZczRX
53 replies 1,220 retweets 2,976 likes -
Replying to @benjaminwittes
See also the 3d graf on this point, which is important because we're about to hear a lot about
#FakeNews. It's the principals speaking. /3/pic.twitter.com/ZQV3H1vnN5
23 replies 684 retweets 1,953 likes -
Replying to @benjaminwittes
The date on this meeting may actually be exculpatory to Trump in one way. Why? It predates the disclosures, I think, of Russian hacking. /4/pic.twitter.com/TGT5bXVNTL
99 replies 568 retweets 1,596 likes
How would that be exculpatory? Wouldn't it be just the other way round? Coordination of information release would be this way round?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.