Schiff invites Taylor to answer when he is asked abt facts not in order. Ratcliffe now saying HE should be able to interrupt and ask about facts not in evidence. He's obviously angry.
-
Show this thread
-
Basically Ratcliffe wants to be able to answer "facts not in evidence," rather than the witness.
3 replies 13 retweets 74 likesShow this thread -
Castor now arguing that for Ukrainians to publicly raise facts abt Manafort's corruption (that Trump FIRED Manafort for) amounts to helping Hillary.
5 replies 33 retweets 110 likesShow this thread -
Castor claims Ukrainians wants to participate thru official channels. But they're not--an official channel goes thru Bruce Swartz.
1 reply 19 retweets 86 likesShow this thread -
Barr has said that he didn't want Trump to invoke him on the 7/25 call. But Castor says it was appropriate.
3 replies 24 retweets 114 likesShow this thread -
Kent schools Castor on how presidential calls happen.
11 replies 31 retweets 207 likesShow this thread -
Taylor describes not getting a readout until several days later from Morrison or Vindman. Kent got his from Vindman.
2 replies 15 retweets 65 likesShow this thread -
Castor inviting Taylor to explain why Ukrainian readout was cryptic.
6 replies 4 retweets 46 likesShow this thread -
Castor: Did Zelensky raise concerns. Taylor: We asked him. He said "I was happy with the call."
3 replies 4 retweets 43 likesShow this thread -
Castor NOW THINKS IT HELPS THAT ZELENSKY RAISED RUDY.
12 replies 21 retweets 117 likesShow this thread
I mean, what on earth? That's like disarming a whole strain of republican counter-narrative?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.