I don’t have a strong view on whether this argument is *legally* correct, but the replacement of Sessions seems like about as egregious an effort to circumvent the “advise and consent” requirement as one could imagine. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/08/opinion/trump-attorney-general-sessions-unconstitutional.html …
I don't think there's much chance / intent of having Whitaker go through Senate confirmation. The VRA doesn't allow that at the same time as being the acting afaik.
-
-
Yeah I know. But that’s sort of the point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.