Be that as it may, do you have thoughts on why this wouldn't be privileged and confidential? As much as I despise Trump, he has rights.
Sure, but at that time it was "just" Cohen doing the recording in a problematic manner. Not anything LE did? So I don't really see why that'd be relevant from a prosecutorial POV?
-
-
We may be in agreement, I can't tell. In general an attorney's recording of a conversation with a client (or contemporaneous notes or whatever) would be privileged. There has to be an exception.
-
(Untagging pwn all the things.) So then you look at the crime/fraud exception and what I'm saying is, I don't see how a conversation about a payoff would rise to that level. (Of course I haven't heard it.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.