Will never understand the idea that the president simply shouldn’t be covered in certain venues. Lots of things should be debated about how they’re done and in some cases covered better. But he’s the president of the United States, still kind of an important policy makerhttps://twitter.com/jdawsey1/status/1015989264931348480 …
I don't think it's crazy to criticize the reporting of a lot of redundant information from rallies etc. That's not to say new potential "policy" (if you can call it that) stances shouldn't be reported. But the "just because the president said it" argument is bogus as heck.