and the apparent mismanagement of at least 2 security bugs in my mind, again I find the all != OSS dissertation as indelicate
I never said that they closed OSS code, no one is saying that. The post says other things which I quoted and consider inaccurate.
-
-
Sorry, I must have misinterpreted "their initial OSS use is being reversed". I see now you meant POLICY not code.
-
indeed, but their OSS code is such probably only because of having to honor licenses, they can't "close" it anyway (legally)...
-
Most, if not all, code from
@Yubico is OSS except for the yubikey firmware. I'd say that is a pretty OSS-friendly policy. -
I fully agree, which is probably the very reason about why some people are disappointed by that important exception.
-
In fact it might put both users and
@Yubico at risk. I'd much rather see a transparent assurance initiative around firmware. -
If you are saying that putting software as OSS might put users at risk then I truly disagree with that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.