@datapulte Les projets comme USBArmory sont des impostures sur le plan technique, c'est du libre Canada Dry ou seul l'OS interne est libre.
@stmanfr @datapulte my French isn't good but I'd be interested to know why you consider our project technically deceiving, if I got it right
-
-
@AndreaBarisani You just cabled an SoC on a flash and made a Free OS running in it. @datapulte -
@stmanfr @datapulte it is as open and verifiable as it gets, good luck finding 100% open silicon to reach same goals and form -
@AndreaBarisani FPGA. @datapulte -
@stmanfr @datapulte not with same form factor anyway I just objected to "deception", all else is your opinion and it is welcome :) -
@AndreaBarisani regarding all other devices made out of non-free OS. I think I am being fair in my security audit. Regards. @datapulte -
@stmanfr @datapulte well I don't share your opinion obviously, but again to each its own...I just don't agree with terms such as "impostor" -
@stmanfr @datapulte which imply intention on our part to be deceptive, and there is none. Anyway thx for clarifications :) -
@AndreaBarisani Please accept my apologize for this. I was just talking about security matters regardings problems like BadUSB. @datapulte - 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@AndreaBarisani No problem. It's because the way you designed USBArmor as a "secure" USB device is not innovative : You just @datapulte -
@stmanfr @datapulte we don't claim 100% innovation and I don't feel there is any deception in the way we present it, it's as open as it gets -
@AndreaBarisani Okay on that. It's just a classical "Free OS" USB device made out of non-free integrated circuits. @datapulte -
@stmanfr @datapulte there's little "classical", form factor is novel and plays a role. Anyway you are of course entitled to your opinion ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@AndreaBarisani is secure JUST because you used a Free OS inside. @datapulte -
@stmanfr @datapulte we don't pretend or claim that its security comes only from its OS, there are lots of hw design principles too -
@AndreaBarisani These electronic schematics innovations you are refering to, what are they ?@datapulte
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@AndreaBarisani used a Free OS inside. That's your "innovation". And if I agree to say it is an important improvement regarding @datapulteThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@AndreaBarisani All the integrated circuits you used are not free. And, the design itself represent NO security innovation. @datapulteThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@AndreaBarisani devices made out of closed OS, it is not enough, according to my crypto-anarchist standards, to pretend that it @datapulteThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.