New paper: "Intel x86 considered harmful": http://blog.invisiblethings.org/papers/2015/x86_harmful.pdf … (Also a short background story: http://blog.invisiblethings.org/2015/10/27/x86_harmful.html …)
-
-
Replying to @rootkovska
@rootkovska a few points to update: the dictionaries have been cracked and there's a tool to dump ME now 1/23 replies 6 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @aionescu
@aionescu But the processor ROM we cannot, right? And this is the most problematic IMHO. I discuss this here:https://github.com/rootkovska/x86_harmful/blob/master/x86_harmful.md#auditing-intel-me …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rootkovska
@rootkovska of course, but that is not different than any other CPU ever made. By this argument, all non open cores are evil.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aionescu
@aionescu Not true. See e.g. iMX53 on USB Armory. /cc@AndreaBarisani2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @rootkovska
@rootkovska@AndreaBarisani bootrom/HAB on imx are open? I thought it's up to SoC implementer2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @aionescu
@aionescu@rootkovska "open" is a strong word, boot ROM can be freely dumped and HAB is documented (mostly) without NDA1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @AndreaBarisani
@aionescu@rootkovska imx is not an architecture, it is one specific SoC implementation1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @AndreaBarisani
@AndreaBarisani@rootkovska I said SoC implementor didn't I?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@aionescu @rootkovska indeed :) I just thought you implied that there can be more than one imx implementor, HAB is also Freescale specific
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.