@dragonnDev @briggsl PIN shifts liability to cardholder, though it can always be intercepted by skimmers, signature liability is different
-
-
Replying to @AndreaBarisani
@AndreaBarisani @dragonnDev regardless of objective shift in responsibility, it is much easier to fool a cashier with signature than a pin.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AndreaBarisani
@AndreaBarisani @dragonnDev I respectfully disagree. As a UK citizen, I've never had trouble in the UK. Multiple issue when in the US1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AndreaBarisani
@AndreaBarisani @dragonnDev yes, fraud happens with chip and pin, it's not perfect, buts it's a vast statistical improvement1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AndreaBarisani
@briggsl @dragonnDev we can use stolen EMV cards with PIN 1234 as of few months ago, and it is really complex to claim those frauds2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AndreaBarisani
@AndreaBarisani @dragonnDev you have absolutely not ability to make you point when you claim the pin is 1234. Provide some data2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@briggsl @dragonnDev http://dev.inversepath.com/download/emv/
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.