@AndreaBarisani @dragonnDev regardless of objective shift in responsibility, it is much easier to fool a cashier with signature than a pin.
@dragonnDev @briggsl PIN shifts liability to cardholder, though it can always be intercepted by skimmers, signature liability is different
-
-
-
@briggsl @dragonnDev the main issue for US is card cloning, not stolen card re-use...Chip & Signature prevents cloning...[cont.] -
@briggsl @dragonnDev while avoiding leveraging on broken PIN verification to improperly wage liability against cardholders -
@briggsl @dragonnDev we routinely handle cases where broken Chip & PIN tech is used against its users, not to protect them. This is wrong.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@AndreaBarisani @dragonnDev people reading the signature have no investment - it makes no sense to make them responsible for fraudThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.