what part of the story is FUD?
-
-
-
Almost entirely omitting the good side of the story, while focusing on questionable information (the Boeing hack being fairly vague if you ask me, the GAO report extremely poor, the sideways claim a joke) is to me, by definition, playing with fear, uncertainty and doubt. (1/2)
-
This is an industry where fear, uncertainty and doubt play little role. There is an extremely rigorous process and there is no good reason to worry the general public with these kind of articles which, while more balanced than others, still reflect poorly reality. (2/2)
-
Fine for me but as I'm being quoted in that article I assume that my claims are also being considered FUD when actually are strictly reflecting *real-world* situations. As usual, anyone will eventually have access to the tech details that back those claims.
-
My tweet wasn't necessarily pointed at your specific comment and it isn't. My only potential remark on your comment could be that I've never seen a data loading platform that "might ... inject malicious malware", and this by design. Of course I haven't audited all DL designs.
-
And my general complain is that there is a worrying trend of reporting unsubstantiated claims first, and then maybe some of them are backed by technical details. As of today not a single real life aircraft hacking story has ever been corroborated with solid technical merits.
-
so you are saying, for example, that the scenario I elaborated in my latest 'aircraft hacking' research didn't actually happen?
-
Which one specifically?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You got bloomberged?

- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
One of the reasons I do not give interviews anymore w/o the right to review and edit. After being burned once on TV and once on radio like how you described.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Rule #1 for sensationalist journalism: if the headline is a question, the answer is always No
Jokes apart, not all security research is equal. And journalists (deliberately) ignore that too often.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am glad that they gave space to anything which could cause concern to the non-technical. At least they didn’t add the “flying sideways” stuff.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.