The crash happened because the human failed to intervene and because the computer, which clearly detected the need for breaking seconds before, wasn’t allowed to intervene (by humans). Let that sink in for a second.https://twitter.com/wsj/status/999653002863693824 …
That is a valid question. It however mostly relates in the investigation (which I care a little less about) and not on the overall use of tech and their advantage in emergency situations (which to me is the interesting larger topic). The NSTB report is public and better than WSJ.
-
-
Thanks for the reference. I see what you mean. The Volvo emergency braking systems were disabled while Uber systems were in control. BUT Uber emergency braking systems were also disabled by Uber. I had misunderstood this had meant the Volvo systems. This is indeed concerning.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.