I often struggle to explain that: 1. Generally, the range of things you could possibly do that are worse than nothing is larger than the range of things that are better AND 2. Trying most things is cheap & when trying in earnest, humans are good filterers of possibility space
Instead, starting with a bunch of cheap experiments lets you find the fun before you commit a ton of resources to full scale production. I can't help but imagine something similar goes for radical social change.
-
-
Neither hippie communes nor Stalinism went *great*, but communes gave some kids herpes and scurvy, and Stalinism killed nine million people. Failing small is almost always preferable.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.