Please expound.
-
-
-
First of all, better suited to western mentality, second of all, better suited to "lower castes", third of all, easier to understand
-
Easier on one level, although genuine dualism opens up a number of other problems - things no longer have a single authentic identity, but rather 2 possible identities, each no less authentic than the other (man no longer meant for the Good, with Evil as an inferior alternative).
-
Surely, it is inferior to monism, but that is also why I said "exoteric" dualism, e.g. the Manichean tradition
-
Perhaps it’s inferior, because seemingly less plausible & logical, but that may be just our Christian & modern conditioning leading us to think that.
-
Ah, but is Christianity not very dualist? God - Satan, Good - Evil, God - Creation, etc. At least in its popular mode of presentation
-
I’d call it a qualified dualism, in that one of the terms is inferior & subordinate to the other. The implications of true dualism are quite different.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.