I like that, but I think that that deals with bigger issues than the one you brought up about Earl's tweet, which I still think is a problem of language, not of nature.
-
-
It’s the one that counts because it’s the one that determines how the mass of believers (and non-believers,come to think of it) behave. In the end, the thought of Heraclitus is not compatible with Christianity. He claims there is no set purpose to human nature, thus no salvation.
-
For Heraclitus, there is nothing to be saved from in any case. Things are what they are, & that’s all.
-
Heraclitus probably didn't write for the masses so his work is not even on the same domain as religion
-
Heraclitus does speak of impiety - for instance, in regard to how ‘poets have imputed to the gods everything that is a shame & reproach among men.’ Probably this was why he despised Homer.
-
It seems that the degeneration of symbolism into "mythology" was already noticed at that time
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.