This is still one of the most embarrassing failures of atheism, not understanding basic logichttps://twitter.com/we_are_atheism/status/1006191050233393152 …
-
-
Replying to @AnarchicEvolist
That you still don’t understand that two sides of a dichotomy can’t be indicative of the same thing is embarrassing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @AnarchicEvolist
What does B mean when everything is indicative of it?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @we_are_atheism
Logic is about the form of reasoning, not its content, so you can substitute any proposition for A and B and it would be logically valid, if it is true is another question.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AnarchicEvolist
And I’ve only questioned the content, when that content is regarding indication. That a syllogism is valid doesn’t necessitate that its contents can’t render the conclusion to be alogical.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @we_are_atheism
Logic is only about the form of reasoning, so the content (a conclusion) is neither logical nor alogical
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AnarchicEvolist
Firstly, logical/alogical is a true dichotomy, so a conclusion can’t be neither. Secondly, a connclusion that is epistemically indistinct from its opposite is alogical.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @we_are_atheism @AnarchicEvolist
‘God’ is a word that has certain imaginative associations. If you want to explore a universe in which different associations hold (for instance, an unintelligible universe), you might try calling it atheism. It’s not a question of using logic to establish probabilities.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RightModernist @we_are_atheism
Logic does not deal in probabilities
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I meant God does not play dice
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.