Does Allah have the ability to love?
-
-
You're conflating 'God' in a predicative sense with a strictly identity sense. Consider the following: - My house is red - My car is red - My bike is red - Therefore, is my bike my car? (identity sense) - Therefore- my red is a bike? (conflating predicative identity)
-
If there is a GCB, something that maximizes greatest potentialities available. Something defined into existence out of necessity, similar to an abstract object & mathematical formula. Then why does that GCB have to be ONE god? If 'God' in my sense is an eternal person?
-
I think the issue is we're using 'God' in a different way. I'll try to explain it this way maybe. Would it make sense to say: "MY Jesus is the Trinity "The Trinity created the Father & Son?" It'd be nonsensical. The Trinity is a way to tell us of God's intra-relations- abstract
-
That's how I see the Platonic One & the Brahman. They're like my Trinity. They're the "GOD" as you're using it. The various Gods that make up the One are truly different Henads/Persons. The One is just the culmination of the causal relations between these Gods.
-
What would you say has logical priority, the One or the Many? Otherwise said, is the One the principle of the Many or the Many the principle of the One?
-
Think the answer is that that the One is the principle of the Many. It goes for me: Henads > The One > w/e else
-
Ah but you say that the 'Henads' are multiple, would they then not be included in the Many?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.