it all comes down to "it's a mystery bro don't bother trying to understand it" so they can get away with saying the Trinity is simple monotheism because they hold two contradicting ideas simultaneously
-
-
the fact that you can make such a distinction at all means you don't believe in pure monotheism
-
Nice argument
-
not really, since I'm saying that divine simplicity by definition does not allow for these sorts of distinctions - being and person in this case being absolutely One and indistinguishable
-
Again, really depends on what is meant by the "divine" in "divine simplicity". If by it "Being" is meant, it is undoubtedly true, if by it "Person" is meant, it is debatable.
-
once again, my point is that the idea that these concepts point to the same thing wrt the divine follows directly from divine simplicity
-
Afraid I'm out of arguments, will come back when I've got some more
-
what's your religion btw, just out of curiosity
-
Traditionalist metaphysics, Christian practice
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.