>believing in negative numbers
Actually heliocentrism and geocentrism are both valid, depending on the perspective, which is entirely in accordance with the symbolism of the Sun and the Earth
-
-
the "objective" perspective would be heliocentrism, which due to the elevation of science is seen as the only valid perspective
-
Non-centrism is the properly valid perspective, since there is no objective centre that we can discover.
-
Actually, all-centrism is the most valid perspective, for every point can be taken as the centre, which is also perfectly in accordance with the symbolism
-
every point is A center, there is no point that can be objectively called THE center
-
Ah, I would say every centre is a centre because it represents the centre, but maybe that's just semantics
-
And this is in accordance with the fact that every particular state can be taken as a foundation for reaching higher states, by virtue of being a point on a ray of the intelligible sun
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.