Yes, they give. But did they take too much? And how do we stop that?https://twitter.com/Forbes/status/1051850189709938689 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
That number should haunt every discussion of philanthropy. All the giving activities are input variables. The output variable is clear: the super-rich monopolized most of what was generated last year. So their giving is overwhelmed by their taking.
This is how generosity becomes the wingman of injustice; and making a difference becomes the wingman of making a killing; and giving back becomes the wingman of taking too much; and “changing the world” becomes the wingman of protecting your place on top of the world.
You know what would be more becoming of @Forbes?
Write a list like this, but focus on the tax strategies that allowed each of these fortunes to be built.
82 percent on loo-poo people do not have a toilet will you teach those back home about ur amazing discoveries here & leave actual Americans alone? this one vs 99 involves us and us alone, not nvaders
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.