Yes, they give. But did they take too much? And how do we stop that?https://twitter.com/Forbes/status/1051850189709938689 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
82 percent of new wealth generated last year was cornered by the top one percent. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/22/wef-18-oxfam-says-worlds-richest-1-percent-get-82-percent-of-the-wealth.html … Which means that some of the very people being feted for giving back are part of the problem they purport to be solving.
That number should haunt every discussion of philanthropy. All the giving activities are input variables. The output variable is clear: the super-rich monopolized most of what was generated last year. So their giving is overwhelmed by their taking.
Whenever I do the math on a "big" donation for is always a laughable amount compared to their wealth. The last comparison I remember was something like $2 per $60k net worth. Might have been something bezos did?
Is there such a thing as generosity from theft?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.