According to this other guy it’s more than that but either way, what’s your point? I grew up in the poorest county in the fourth poorest state. I knew a lot of people who were happy to be unemployed and collect welfare checks and food stamps. UBI won’t fix poverty.
-
-
It's not at all weird as soon as you consider that it's extremely useful in maintaining the coercive social order! Indeed, that seems to be the *point of* the way that the system is set up but you probably know that.)
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
(Jealous of the likes and retweets this got) No, it’s not pathological. If people didn’t sell their labor and instead either worked...
- Još 26 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
It’s just an accounting system for value. People value their time and their labor. A medium of exchange is far easier than trying to directly exchange labor for all goods.
-
Medium of exchange is fine. The problem I'm pointing out is that by trying to use labor markets to solve two problems (labor allocation for production and distribution of output) we end up doing a half assed job of both. Full employment at only 77% capacity screams failure.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.