On the oil majors, the question seems to be whether they are just opposed to a policy patchwork and prefer the federal venue for how the outcome will take shape, or whether they still support “carbon taxes”, just not any they’ll ever actually met in a legislature or on a ballot.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Very frustrating that oil, nat gas and utilities don't use these resources to help their businesses transition to the clean energy future rather than sabotage policy progress..missing big opportunity
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Have you asked climate aware investors who own these companies whether they are going to continue to stay silent about this kind of use of shareholder money?
-
Good idea
-
This is something endowments with engaged staff and students could usefully lead on. Don't forget energy utility companies- it's too easy to focus just on fossil fuel companies!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
should be illegal
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2/ so there is no guarantee that Q6 will ultimately pass - its like a legislator voting yes on motion to proceed or bring a bill to the floor , but no on final passage - take a look at your morning newsletter may want to refine it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
$63 million was spent defeating Question 3 the “ Energy Choice” initiative in Nevada allowing competitive supply - Q 6 Renewable Energy Promotion , a 50% renewable mandate passed unopposed - For now - that gets it to a final 2020 vote, but #3 had 75% to go vote but failed...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.